Lewis Carroll explains his rationale behind the delay in the final global attempt.
Pete Carroll's Late Field Goal Attempt: Why Las Vegas LostIn the Las Vegas Raiders game against the Denver Broncos, Pete Carroll faced a significant challenge when his team attempted a late field goal with only 8 seconds remaining. Unlike the usual 5-second clock scenario for FG attempts, which allows two teams to score and declare possession, the Raiders opted for an extra second. This decision was made with the consideration of not risking possession and instead securing a bigger play.
Why the Raiders Chose Extra Time:
Carroll understood the importance of finishing off his opponent's attempt, especially in high-stakes games. He believed that finishing on time would secure possession and potentially lead to an important play. The extra time allowed both teams to strengthen their defenses, which was crucial given the Broncos' strong offense and a resilient defense.
The Result:
Despite the late FG attempt, the Raiders failed to convert it. They ended up scoring 10 points from the in vain attempt due to the defensive line's block. This loss was frustrating for the team, as it ended what could have been an easy victory. Instead of allowing possession and forcing a play, the Raiders turned the ball over to their defense.
The Suboptimal Decision:
Carroll's choice was a deliberate risk, prioritizing security and winnable opportunities over the potential to gain possession. He didn't want to risk losing possession without extra time but also wanted to capitalize on an easy victory. This approach made him vulnerable in later games, as he struggled to maintain the pressure when it came up.
Impact on the Game:
The Raiders' decision cost them a significant point and left them in a difficult position with the game on the table. The Broncos were determined to secure another win, but their inability to take advantage of the defensive blinding was problematic.
In summary, Pete Carroll's late field goal attempt was an unwise move that ended his team's victory potential. His decision reflects the strategic considerations of game outcomes and risk management in football. Future teams should consider such decisions based on both defense and offense when choosing FG attempts.
------
